Earlier in March, Seah Kian Peng, a Member of Parliament in Singapore, “expressed shock” at the overwhelming number of foreign faculty members in Singapore’s universities. Seah pointed out the need for more Singaporean academics in “context-sensitive subjects like political science.” In fact, he was flabbergasted that Singaporean faculty members made up the minority (28% of the 25 faculty members) in the National University of Singapore’s (NUS) political science department. However, Seah’s comments came as no surprise to many Singaporean academics and graduate students. 1 Almost exactly a year ago, Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Eugene Tan, an associate professor of Law at Singapore Management University, raised the same issue in parliament. Indranee Rajah, Senior Minister of State for Education, pointed out that Singaporeans made up one in four (25%) faculty members on the tenure-track in both NUS and Nanyang Technological University (NTU); Singapore Management University’s (SMU) figure is one in six (16.6%); and Singapore University of Technology and Design’s (SUTD) figure is one in three (33.3%). 2 In other words, Singaporean faculty members are a minority in Singapore’s universities. 3
Diversity or a pro-foreigner policy?
Singaporean faculty members are a minority in Singapore’s universities.
The lack of Singaporean academics in local universities has drawn mixed response from Singaporeans. While some pointed out the lack of Singaporean PhDs to fill faculty positions in local universities as well as the need for academic diversity, others launched a rant at the government’s seemingly “pro-foreigner policy” and made unfair attacks on foreign faculty members teaching in Singapore’s universities. 4 A recent featured article in The Straits Times highlights the shortage of Singaporean faculty members in local universities and the latent tensions between local and foreign scholars. According to NMP Eugene Tan, “Currently, one in two tenured faculty members across the board is Singaporean. But a significant number of them will be reaching retirement age in the next 10 years.” 5
A few months ago, Carissa Kang gave a presentation entitled “Singapore’s Academic Outlook: Opinions from Singaporean PhD Students” for her “Professional Development” seminar at Cornell University. With the help of several PhD friends, she conducted and analyzed an exploratory online survey (using the snowball method) to find out the opinions of Singaporean PhD students (those pursuing their PhDs in Singapore and overseas) towards the local academic job market (see survey questions below). She was interested in finding out if the low proportion of Singaporean faculty could be due a supply side issue (i.e., Singaporean PhD students not wanting to work in Singapore), rather than a demand issue (i.e., discriminatory hiring policies). Forty-three responses from PhD students who are currently pursuing their doctoral degree in different parts of the world were received. 6
From the survey, only about half (51%) the respondents reported that they were planning to stay on in academia. 28% would definitely not pursue an academic career, while 18% remain unsure. Interestingly, one respondent (a Singaporean PhD student pursuing his degree in Singapore) wrote, “Yes, but I can’t,” because he feels that “Singaporean PhD graduates aren’t valued. I’d apply, but chances of being shortlisted are bleak.” 7
As for the question on whether one would apply for jobs in Singapore or elsewhere in the world, less than half of our 43 respondents (40%) gave a definite “Yes.” While 19% responded “Maybe,” another 14% would rather work overseas. 8
Some of the qualified PhD candidates mentioned that the thought of applying for a faculty position in Singapore never crossed their minds.
For Singaporean PhD students who expressed interest in the possibility of working in Singapore, the reasons they provided for wanting to do so include: family, familiarity with culture and environment, government bond, increased opportunity of being hired, and suitable job openings. On the other hand, those who expressed reservations about working in Singapore, (i.e., unwilling to become a faculty member in the local universities) cited reasons such as limited opportunities, the possibility of having all positions in their field being filled, the lack of academic freedom, 9 a more vibrant intellectual community in the United States, and an inflexible system with narrow-minded grading where “Singaporean universities are stuck on an archaic system where the registrar assigns grades, not the professor.” 10 What struck us most however was that some of the most qualified PhD candidates mentioned that the thought of applying for a faculty position in Singapore never crossed their minds.
When asked if they felt that Singaporean universities had a preference for hiring foreigners, an overwhelming number of Singaporean PhD students responded either “Yes” (44%) or “Maybe” (38%). Only a small 18% felt that local universities do not have a preference for hiring foreign faculty members. In general, the perceived preference for hiring foreign faculty members can broadly be categorized into five main reasons:
- obsession with world rankings and the desire to hire “big names” to produce publications, win prestigious grants, and obtain recognition on the international scene;
- inferiority complex with reference to education as foreigner academics being perceived as “superior” to locals;
- assumption that locals can be “bullied” into staying since their families are in Singapore;
- Singaporean universities not playing a proactive role in recruiting local talents studying abroad; and
- Singaporean universities not putting in enough effort to cultivating and retaining Singaporean academics who are already working in Singapore.
The fact that some of the most qualified PhD students did not even consider applying to Singapore is in itself a lamentable issue.
The fact that some of the most qualified PhD students did not even consider applying to Singapore is in itself a lamentable issue.
Hiring policies and selection criteria
A question lies ahead: how can Singaporean universities attract outstanding local talents to come back to work in Singapore? First, universities can demystify hiring policies and make selection criteria more transparent. Oftentimes, a foreign faculty member is hired not because the university prefers foreigners, but simply because no Singaporean has the matching research interests to apply for the position in the first place. Through demystifying hiring policies and selection criteria, this would help to assure Singaporeans that they are not discriminated against and are more than welcome to apply for jobs back home. Second, Singaporean universities should play a more proactive role in recruiting and retaining local talents. The fact that some of the most qualified PhD students did not even consider applying to Singapore is in itself a lamentable issue. It is noted that NUS offers the Overseas Graduate Scholarship and the Overseas Postdoctoral Fellowship schemes to “nurture high caliber Singaporeans for an academic career in NUS.” 11 Although the two scholarships are publicly advertised on the NUS website, several respondents highlighted that such scholarship application is only by invitation. NUS Law School has recently introduced the Sheridan Fellowship to “serve as a bridge between either undergraduate study or work in the legal profession and a tenure-track academic position with a strong foundation in Singapore law.” 12 SMU too, has launched a faculty development scheme that funds overseas PhDs for Singaporean graduates interested in pursuing an academic career. 13 As far as we know though, other Singaporean universities, however, do not offer such scholarship schemes. Finally, Singaporean universities could also consider making advance job offers to Singaporean ABDs with stellar publication and teaching records, and are committed to return and contribute to Singapore’s research and education.
A need to nurture its own
At the end of it all, an ever-bigger question remains: Why hire locals? After all, with the current global obsession with world university rankings, promoting academic diversity and hiring renowned foreign scholars rather than recruiting young local talents is a more attractive and viable option to further advance the global image and international standing of Singapore’s universities. However, as Southeast Asianists born and raised in Singapore, we hope to end on a more romantic note. The late eminent Southeast Asian historian, Harry J. Benda, once observed that Southeast Asian intelligentsias actively engaged in promoting political development and social justice in their home country and in the region. 14 Singaporeans simply cannot expect foreign intellectuals to engage politicians, lobby for social reforms, and advocate for the preservation of cultural heritage on their behalf. Rather, Singapore needs to nurture its own Singaporean intelligentsia and play a more proactive role in attracting talent back home.
Jack Chia and Carissa Kang 15
Jack Chia is a PhD candidate in Southeast Asian History at Cornell University. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Carissa Kang is a PhD candidate in Developmental Psychology at Cornell University. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia (issue 15), Young Academics Voice, May 2014
- Field of study
- Year entered PhD & Expected graduation
- Where/which school are you pursuing your PhD?
Opinions towards the local academic job market
- Do you intend on staying in academia?
- Are you planning to apply for jobs in Singapore? Why/why not?
- Applying for jobs elsewhere? Why?
- What are some reasons as to why you would or would not apply for faculty positions in Singapore?
- Do you think Singaporean universities have a preference for hiring foreigners?
Opinions towards the lack of Singaporean academics in Singapore’s universities
- In Mar 2013, NMP Eugene Tan commented on the disappointingly low number of Singaporeans who are faculty members (tenure and non-tenure tracks) in Singapore’s 4 universities. 1 in 4 faculty members on the tenure track is a Singaporean (at NUS & NTU) while at SMU, it’s 1 in 6.
- We do not have figures for percentage of locals in universities in other countries, but based on these figures alone, why do you think this might be the case?
- What do you think of it?
Read more Young Academics Voice’ articles—
- Charissa Yong, “Paying More Heed to the Short-Term Humps in Life,” The Straits Times, March 31, 2014, http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapore/paying-more-heed-short-term-humps-life?page=0%2C1 ↩
- “Not Enough Singaporean Faculty Members,” My Paper, March 08, 2013, http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20130308-407128.html ↩
- There are currently five public autonomous universities (National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore Institute of Technology, and Singapore University of Technology and Design), a public autonomous liberal arts college (Yale-NUS College), and a private publicly funded university (SIM University). ↩
- “Singapore’s Over-reliance on Anton Caseys,” The Unseen Singapore, January 24, 2014, http://theunseensingapore.blogspot.com/2014/01/singapores-over-reliance-on-anton-caseys.html ↩
- Charissa Yong and Andrea Ong, “Wanted: Local Talent in Varsities,” The Straits Times, April 5, 2013, http://news.asiaone.com/news/edvantage/wanted-local-talent-varsities. ↩
- Given that the majority of the respondents were pursuing their PhDs overseas, it is imperative to highlight that findings from this survey might be biased possibly due to the respondents’ lack of information, some respondents about local universities’ policies, or that those who chose to pursue their PhDs overseas might already be predisposed to staying overseas eventually.Tables 1, 2 and 3 present their basic demographics and their distribution by schools and academic fields. ↩
- Just like in many leading universities around the world, Singaporean universities usually do not hire their own graduates so as to prevent “intellectual inbreeding.” ↩
- We cannot definitively imply that the “Maybes” were leaning towards “No” and we hope to ask for more specific details in our future studies. ↩
- Last year, Cherian George, a prominent Singaporean journalism professor from the Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information at Nanyang Technological University, was denied tenure. One of George’s students started a petition and suggested that the “decision was politically motivated because of his past criticism of the Government.” Professor Karin Wahl-Jorgensen of Cardiff University said the decision was “ludicrous,” given his strong academic and teaching record, and suggested that he was “denied tenure because he sometimes expresses political opinions.” However, she later told The Straits Times via email that she had no evidence of this, and added that “his publications on media policy and censorship, particularly in Malaysia and Singapore, have made a significant impact.” See Feng Zengkun, “Petition Over NTU’s Decision to Deny Professor Tenure,”The Straits Times, March 1, 2013, http://www.asiaone.com/print/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20130228-405251.html ↩
- The assertion on the “archaic” grading system is not entirely true. NUS Provost Tan Eng Chye explained the bell curve in one of his blog posts. See “The Bell Curve,” The NUS Provost Contemplates, January 20, 2012, http://blog.nus.edu.sg/provost/2012/01/20/the-bell-curve/comment-page-2/ ↩
- http://www.nus.edu.sg/careers/scholarships.htm ↩
- https://law.nus.edu.sg/about_us/sheridan_fellows.html. ↩
- Yong and Ong, “Wanted: Local Talent in Varsities.” Application details for the faculty development scheme are not available on the SMU website. ↩
- Harry J. Benda, “Non-Western Intelligensias as Political Elites,” Australian Journal of Politics & History 6, 2 (1960): 205-218. ↩
- Author order is alphabetical. This article is a revised version of an earlier working paper of the same title. We are grateful to Stephen Ceci, Chan Yingkit, Ian Chong, Saroja Dorairajoo, Lai Ah Eng, Lim Wah Guan, Hanisah Binte Abdullah Sani, Victor Seow, Lindsay Strogatz, Eugene Tan, and Nurfadzilah Yahaya for their helpful comments. However, all remaining errors are ours. ↩